Skip to main content
Understanding Grief and Loss in Lebanon
by Ali-Sebastian Merdas
<code>Guided grief counseling in Lebanon – culturally sensitive CBT strategies for loss, mourning, and emotional recovery</code><br/>

Grief is a natural response to loss, but for some people the process becomes unusually prolonged or intense. In Lebanon’s tumultuous context – marked by wars, political unrest, the Beirut port explosion, and large diaspora communities – many bereaved individuals face compounded losses and stressors. Worldwide, about 10–20% of bereaved people develop a prolonged grief disorder (PGD) – an enduring, disabling grief reaction recognized in the ICD-11 and DSM-5 as Persistent Complex Bereavament Disorder (PCBD). In Lebanon, close family ties and collective experiences mean that losses affect entire communities. Mourning rituals (e.g. multi-day “عaza” condolences gatherings), family support networks, and religious practices (Islamic, Christian etc.) all shape how individuals experience grief.

When grief exceeds cultural norms – e.g. when intense yearning, guilt, or disbelief persist beyond 6–12 months – it may reflect a clinical condition requiring help. Untreated complicated grief can impair functioning and increase depression or PTSD. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) offers one of the strongest evidence-based approaches for such conditions. It can help people reprocess the loss, challenge unhelpful beliefs, and gradually resume valued activities. The next sections review CBT models and evidence for treating grief, and discuss adaptations for Lebanese cultural contexts.

CBT Models Applied to Grief

CBT conceptualizes prolonged grief in terms of dysfunctional thoughts and behaviors. For example, Beck’s cognitive model of depression – which highlights pervasive negative beliefs about the self, world, and future – can be extended to grief. In this view, a bereaved person with a negative worldview (“I am unlovable,” “life is meaningless”) may interpret the death as a personal rejection or confirmation of defectiveness. Such beliefs amplify sadness and hopelessness: “The reality of the loss tends to reinforce those [negative] ideas,” the model notes. Grief-focused CBT thus aims to identify these unhelpful appraisals (e.g. self-blame, beliefs that “I cannot go on”) and to reframe them more adaptively, reducing self-criticism and fatalism.

Another key idea from CBT is behavioral avoidance. Gauthier and Marshall argue that if a bereaved person avoids reminders of the deceased (fearing the pain of memories), this only backfires. Attempts to suppress thoughts create secondary anxiety: each intrusive image or memory triggers panic (“Oh no, here comes the pain!”) and leads to more avoidance. This cycle prevents emotional processing of the loss. Consistent with this model, CBT treatments often incorporate exposure strategies: for example, writing or speaking about the circumstances of death, visiting the gravesite, or reviewing mementos in therapy. By gradually confronting the loss in a safe way, the memory becomes less distressing and the person learns that they can tolerate the grief.

For losses involving trauma (e.g. violent death, terrorism, combat), CBT draws on Ehlers & Clark’s model of PTSD. This model (diagrammed below) shows how poorly integrated memories and catastrophic appraisals create a sense of current threat. Intrusive images of the death and rigid beliefs (“It could happen again,” “I’m unsafe”) fuel flashbacks and hypervigilance, as if the danger is present now. Cognitive therapy for traumatic bereavement therefore targets these processes: therapists help clients update their trauma memory (e.g. through imaginal reliving) and restructure catastrophic thoughts. One innovative technique, “intangible continuity,” encourages clients to find ways that the deceased loved one’s meaning can live on (e.g. carrying on their values), rather than focusing on letting go. This shifts the theme from “finality” to “ongoing legacy,” which can ease the sense of losing a part of oneself.

In summary, CBT models view complicated grief as maintained by a combination of maladaptive beliefs (e.g. “I deserve this,” “The world is cruel”), memories and imagery of the loss that aren’t fully processed, and avoidance or safety behaviors (e.g. staying home and withdrawing) that prevent healing. Therapy targets all these: helping clients face reminders of the loss while simultaneously learning to challenge distorted cognitions and reinvest in life activities.

Empirical Evidence for CBT in Grief

Numerous studies support the effectiveness of CBT for prolonged or complicated grief. A recent meta-analysis in 2024 by Komischke‐Konnerup et al. pooled 22 randomized trials (n≈2600) and found that grief-focused CBT produced significant medium-to-large effects on PGD symptoms. The overall effect size was g≈0.65 (95%CI [0.49,0.81]) at treatment end, rising to g≈0.90 at follow-up. In plain terms, CBT clients showed much greater reductions in grief intensity than control participants, and these improvements held or even increased over time. Similar meta-analytic effects were seen for PTSD and depression symptoms in grief-focused CBT trials (g≈0.53–0.74), reflecting its broad benefit on co-occurring distress.

In direct comparisons to non-specific therapies, CBT for grief also outperforms supportive counseling. For example, Boelen et al. (2007) randomly assigned 54 bereaved adults (with clinically significant complicated grief) to either CBT (exposure + cognitive restructuring) or to a “present-centered” supportive therapy. The CBT group showed greater improvement in grief and overall psychopathology than the supportive group. In fact, combining exposure with cognitive work (in either order) yielded much larger gains than counseling alone. Notably, sessions focused only on cognitive restructuring were less effective than those including exposure: “pure” exposure (repeatedly confronting memories of the loss) produced better outcomes than “pure” restructuring, and doing exposure first improved subsequent cognitive work. These results underscore the potency of exposure-based components in grief therapy.

Online and brief CBT programs have also shown promise. In a German RCT, Treml et al. (2021) tested a 5-week internet-based CBT for people with prolonged grief after suicide. Even with just ten brief writing assignments, the treatment yielded large effect sizes (d≈1.0) on PGD symptoms compared to wait-list controls. By post-treatment, participants had dramatic reductions in yearning and intrusive grief memories (effect size d_ppc2≈1.03). Depressive symptoms and grief-specific concerns also fell significantly in the online CBT group. These findings suggest that CBT principles can be delivered effectively in diverse formats – face-to-face or digital – to reach more people in need.

Taken together, the empirical data are clear: CBT interventions significantly reduce prolonged grief symptoms. Meta-analytic and controlled-trial evidence consistently shows medium-to-large improvements following CBT. Effects are generally larger than for non-directive therapies, and are robust across grief-related problems (loss from illness, accidents, suicide, trauma, etc.). In practice, therapists in Lebanon can therefore be confident that a grief-focused CBT approach is grounded in the best available science.

Adapting CBT for Lebanese Grievers

Culturally adapted CBT maintains core techniques but weaves in local context. For Lebanese clients, therapists often do the following:

  • Language and Concepts: Use the client’s primary language (Arabic, French, or English) and culturally resonant metaphors. For example, faith-based motifs may be integrated: acknowledging beliefs that “this was God’s plan” or “the deceased is a martyr” as part of cognitive discussion. Psychoeducation can draw on familiar proverbs about loss or scriptural ideas about tests and reward, helping reinterpret thoughts in a culturally acceptable frame.
  • Family Involvement: Since decisions and coping often involve family elders, therapy may invite relatives to join sessions (with consent) or to help carry out homework. Therapists might coach families in how to support the mourner (e.g. listen attentively, validate feelings) without reinforcing maladaptive avoidance. In Lebanon’s extended-family culture, reconnecting the client with family traditions (visiting the tomb on certain days, praying together) can be part of the plan, rather than isolating grief.
  • Integration of Rituals: Specific mourning rituals are incorporated where possible. For instance, if an Islamic client’s custom is to recite Qur’an or hold a remembrance gathering, these can be acknowledged as coping tools. A technique might involve the client describing the condolence gatherings as part of exposure: “Describe for me what happens on Day 1 after the funeral” to process the emotions safely. If physical rituals (like laying a flower at a grave) have been painful, therapists can gently reintroduce these in-session to help reduce avoidance.
  • Addressing Stigma: Some Lebanese (especially men) may find therapy unfamiliar. Therapists often clarify that CBT is a skill-building program (not a sign of weakness) and can even be framed as intellectual problem-solving. Where community stigma is strong, telephone or online sessions may be offered for privacy.
  • Diaspora/Lifestyle Factors: For Lebanese expatriates grieving a loss back home (or vice versa), therapists consider issues of distance and helplessness. Techniques may include virtual participation in rituals (e.g. video calls to a ceremony) and helping clients create their own symbolic memorials if travel isn’t possible. Loss of multiple relatives (common in war survivor families) may call for a transdiagnostic approach, addressing several losses together.

Research on Middle Eastern populations underscores these points. A recent qualitative study of Syrian refugees emphasized that religion and community are primary “resources for grieving”. Participants recommended that interventions explicitly invite religious coping (prayer, clerical support) and communal remembrance activities. It also highlighted that narratives and memory-sharing are expected; technology (like a “memory wall” exercise) can foster communal grieving even in individual therapy. All clients, whether in Lebanon or abroad, benefit when therapists show knowledge of traditions (like Ramadan observances, Christmas memorials, or Ashura mourning) and tailor homework accordingly.

In short, CBT for Lebanese grievers is not merely “Western therapy plus Arabic language.” It is a deeply contextualized approach: one that respects honor/shame dynamics, integrates familial roles, and harnesses faith and communal traditions as therapeutic assets. When applied thoughtfully, culturally sensitive CBT preserves its empirical efficacy while resonating with the lived experience of Lebanese clients.

Importantly, while CBT is widely credited to 20th-century figures such as Aaron Beck, the conceptual foundations of cognitive therapy can be traced back to scholars from this region. Notably, Abu Zayd Al-Balkhi, a 9th-century physician and thinker from the Islamic Golden Age, proposed early models of psychological distress and cognitive restructuring in his treatise Sustenance of the Soul (Masalih al-Abdan wa al-Anfus). He emphasized the interconnection between thought, emotion, and behavior – a framework strikingly aligned with modern CBT principles. We will explore Al-Balkhi’s contributions and their relevance to contemporary grief therapy later in this article.

Cognitive Analytica’s Grief-Focused CBT

Therapists at Cognitive Analytica are trained in specialized grief-CBT protocols and adhere to rigorous clinical standards. All our grief counselors are licensed psychologists with official credentials. They have completed extensive CBT training (often including an accredited CBT diploma program) and receive ongoing supervision.

In practice, Cognitive Analytica therapists use a structured framework grounded in the research literature. A typical grief-CBT program might involve 8–12 sessions that include: grief education, exposure exercises (imaginal retelling of the death, visiting meaningful places), cognitive restructuring of unhelpful beliefs (using tools like thought records), and behavioral activation (re-engaging in life-affirming activities).

Finally, Cognitive Analytica emphasizes empirical accountability. Just as the global data show CBT’s efficacy in grief, our therapists routinely measure outcomes (using standardized grief scales) to ensure each client is improving. This data-driven approach means that the strong scientific evidence is directly linked to each person’s treatment. In sum, Cognitive Analytica’s team merges the scientific model (Beck’s and Ehlers-Clark’s frameworks, evidence-based protocols) with Lebanese compassion and competence in bereavement care.

Grieving a loss is never easy, especially under Lebanon’s complex social stresses, but effective help is available. Decades of research confirm that cognitive-behavioral therapy can significantly reduce prolonged grief symptoms. By working with your thoughts, memories, and gradual re-engagement with life, CBT can rekindle hope even when bereavement feels unbearable. Cognitive Analytica therapists stand ready to guide you through this process in a culturally informed way. If you or a loved one are struggling to move forward after a death, consider reaching out for grief-focused CBT. Our clinicians will tailor proven strategies to your unique situation—honoring Lebanese values and rituals while helping you heal. Taking this step links the best of scientific evidence to practical support, so that, in the words of our research, you “move forward with the loss” of your loved one with resilience and meaning.

Let's talk
We would love to hear from you!